Ah ok, vielen Dank. D.h., ich kann wohl biblatex aus dem AUR, das ich noch installiert habe, deinstallieren.
Aber noch eine blöde Frage: Wo hätte ich das selbst herausfinden können?
Edit: Jetzt tut es nicht mehr 🙁.
! Package keyval Error: {{Deuflhard}{D.}{Peter}{P.}{}{}{}{}}{{Hohmann}{H.}{Andr
eas}{A.}{}{}{}{}} undefined.
See the keyval package documentation for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...
l.3153 \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]
Try typing <return> to proceed.
If that doesn't work, type X <return> to quit.
! Missing \endcsname inserted.
<to be read again>
\global
l.3153 \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]
The control sequence marked <to be read again> should
not appear between \csname and \endcsname.
! Missing \endcsname inserted.
<to be read again>
\global
l.3153 \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]
The control sequence marked <to be read again> should
not appear between \csname and \endcsname.
! Extra \endcsname.
\KV@default ...@prefix \@tempa @default\endcsname
\ifx \@tempb \relax \KV@er...
l.3153 \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]
I'm ignoring this, since I wasn't doing a \csname.
! Argument of \KV@@sp@b has an extra }.
<inserted text>
\par
l.3153 \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]
I've run across a `}' that doesn't seem to match anything.
For example, `\def\a#1{...}' and `\a}' would produce
this error. If you simply proceed now, the `\par' that
I've just inserted will cause me to report a runaway
argument that might be the root of the problem. But if
your `}' was spurious, just type `2' and it will go away.
Runaway argument?
! Paragraph ended before \KV@@sp@b was complete.
<to be read again>
\par
l.3153 \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]
I suspect you've forgotten a `}', causing me to apply this
control sequence to too much text. How can we recover?
My plan is to forget the whole thing and hope for the best.
! Missing number, treated as zero.
<to be read again>
}
l.3153 \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]
A number should have been here; I inserted `0'.
(If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number,
look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.)
! Missing = inserted for \ifnum.
<to be read again>
}
l.3153 \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]
I was expecting to see `<', `=', or `>'. Didn't.
! Missing number, treated as zero.
<to be read again>
}
l.3153 \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]
A number should have been here; I inserted `0'.
(If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number,
look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.)
! Argument of \list has an extra }.
<inserted text>
\par
l.3153 \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]
I've run across a `}' that doesn't seem to match anything.
For example, `\def\a#1{...}' and `\a}' would produce
this error. If you simply proceed now, the `\par' that
I've just inserted will cause me to report a runaway
argument that might be the root of the problem. But if
your `}' was spurious, just type `2' and it will go away.
Runaway argument?
! Paragraph ended before \list was complete.
<to be read again>
\par
l.3153 \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]
I suspect you've forgotten a `}', causing me to apply this
control sequence to too much text. How can we recover?
My plan is to forget the whole thing and hope for the best.
! Argument of \list has an extra }.
<inserted text>
\par
l.3153 \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]
I've run across a `}' that doesn't seem to match anything.
For example, `\def\a#1{...}' and `\a}' would produce
this error. If you simply proceed now, the `\par' that
I've just inserted will cause me to report a runaway
argument that might be the root of the problem. But if
your `}' was spurious, just type `2' and it will go away.
Runaway argument?
! Paragraph ended before \list was complete.
<to be read again>
\par
l.3153 \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]
I suspect you've forgotten a `}', causing me to apply this
control sequence to too much text. How can we recover?
My plan is to forget the whole thing and hope for the best.
! Undefined control sequence.
\blx@data@0@stoerbulirsch1 ...def \abx@field@note
{Hinweis: Die Autoren f\"u...
l.3153 \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
! Argument of \list has an extra }.
<inserted text>
\par
l.3153 \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]
I've run across a `}' that doesn't seem to match anything.
For example, `\def\a#1{...}' and `\a}' would produce
this error. If you simply proceed now, the `\par' that
I've just inserted will cause me to report a runaway
argument that might be the root of the problem. But if
your `}' was spurious, just type `2' and it will go away.
Runaway argument?
! Paragraph ended before \list was complete.
<to be read again>
\par
l.3153 \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc]
Die Fehlermeldugnen in der Log setzen sich ungefähr so auch fort. Ich hoffe, ihr benötigt noch kein Minimalbeispiel, aber irgendwas mag er da jetzt nicht mehr 🙁.
"ForwardPDF" funktioniert ja seit geraumer Zeit in Kile auch schon nicht mehr wirklich 🙁.
Edit 2: Hmm ... ich habe zuerst "[heading=bibintoc]" rausgenommen, dann tat es immer noch nicht. dann hab ich die ganze "\printbibliography..." Zeile rausgenommen und es ging zu kompilieren. Dann habe ich sie wieder MIT "[heading=bibintoc]" reingenommen und nochmal kompiliert. Seither geht es wieder. Hö? Was war denn das?
Ich bekomme jetzt nur noch eine Warnung, dass "Data encoding is 'uft8'" sei, was irgendwas mit dem biblatex Paket zu tun haben muss, was, weiß ich jedoch nicht genau.